Respond to the two posts

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Respond to the two posts  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do my paper

Post 1: Performance management is a cornerstone of organizational success, ensuring that employees are aligned with the company’s goals and continuously improving their performance. Different schemes are adopted by organizations to achieve this, each with its own set of benefits and drawbacks. Let’s delve into these aspects.

360-Degree Feedback offers a comprehensive view of an employee’s performance, incorporating feedback from various sources. This fosters self-awareness but can suffer from bias and time consumption.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) set clear objectives and are easy to measure, but an overemphasis on quantitative goals may result in overlooking qualitative aspects or gaming the system.

Management by Objectives (MBO) encourages collaborative goal setting and alignment, but unclear objectives or disputes can hamper its effectiveness.

The Balanced Scorecard balances financial and non-financial metrics for a holistic view, but it can be complex to implement and manage.

However, it’s important to recognize that performance management schemes can sometimes fail, both for individuals and organizations. Here are a few key reasons:

1. Lack of Clarity: Unclear expectations can frustrate employees and diminish motivation.
2. Biased Evaluation: Personal biases and politics can lead to unfair assessments, eroding trust.
3. Inadequate Feedback: Without regular, constructive feedback, employees may not know how to improve.
4. Inflexibility: Rigid systems can stifle innovation and agility.
5. Overemphasis on Punishment: Focusing solely on punishment can create a culture of fear.
6. Resistance to Change: Employees and managers may resist new systems due to fear or skepticism.

In conclusion, effective performance management hinges on aligning the chosen scheme with organizational culture and objectives. Regular, fair, and constructive feedback is pivotal. The goal should be to balance the benefits, minimize drawbacks, and ensure that performance management contributes positively to both individuals and the organization as a whole.

Post 2:

The main performance management schemes of organizations are rating, ranking, the critical incident technique, 180-degree feedback, 360-degree feedback, and competency-based assessment. Rating involves using a predetermined scale to “rate” the performance of each individual employee according to the scale. Managers converse about the performance of each employee, which can lead to some subjectivity when giving the rating due to varying degrees of harshness or bias towards any particular employee. Ranking involves ordering employees on a “1-10” type scale against other employees rather than an individual rating. This method of performance management is one of the easiest to perform. However, it has a few downfalls because it can cause internal competition amongst employees as well as cause them to lose sight of being part of the team due to fear of a low rank which could lead to termination. The critical incident technique examines both good and bad incidents of employee actions at work and exposes an individualized discussion of performance for each employee. This approach is more time consuming but ultimately gives more employee-specific feedback than rating and ranking. 180-degree feedback is a style of “upward appraisal” that allows employees to anonymously give feedback on the performance of managers without fear of retaliation or unfair treatment. This scheme of performance evaluation allows the employee to be heard and express thoughts and ideas to management that otherwise may not be expressed. 360-degree feedback includes feedback from peers, managers, and customers to allow for a holistic look at the employee’s performance. This allows the employee to see how they are performing according to each demographic they encounter each day and allows for honest feedback that can be either anonymous or not. Competency-based assessment looks at past performance of tasks to predict future performance and growth. This tool allows managers to look at how well a task was performed as well as what was achieved with the task. A downfall with this approach is employee consistency with performance due to examining only past events.

Performance management can fail to deliver accurate and honest feedback for several reasons including if the evaluation was confidential or not, style of evaluation, and who was performing the evaluation. Performance management may also cause more harm than good depending on the type of feedback delivered. Employees may become stressed and perform poorly if performance feedback is pressed as a “pass or fail” scenario. In other instances, employees may have no control over their performance in cases such as patient volume or even profits per month in hard times such as the pandemic.