Description
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Policy Memo # 2 completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
POLICY MEMO #2: Due 11/7 before class:
Explain why a system where governments pay donors for their kidneys is (or is not) a good idea. Make sure to consider and include a range of evaluation criteria in assessing the policy.
Each memo should not exceed four pages double spaced, 12-point font. You will be graded on your logic and analysis as well as how clearly you present your case. Each policy memo should DIRECTLY address the prompt in the syllabus. You should ALWAYS take into account political feasibility when recommending/defending a policy. Outside reading and research is welcome but not required.
|
Argument
|
| 20 >18.0
Masterful (90-100%)
Explicitly states a compelling, well-structured argument that directly addresses the prompt with internal logical consistency.
|
18 >17.0
Skilled
Explicitly states a strong argument that effectively addresses the prompt with good logical consistency.
|
17 >16.0
Proficient
Presents a clear argument, generally addressing the prompt with logical consistency.
|
16 >15.0 分
Developing
Argument is present but may not fully address the prompt or lacks depth and/or logical consistency.
|
15 >14.0
Emerging
Argument is weak, unclear, or tangentially addresses the prompt, with potential issues in logical consistency.
|
14 >0
Insufficient
Lacks a coherent argument or does not address the prompt, with significant issues in logical consistency.
|
|
20 point
|
|
Exposition and Formatting
|
| 15 >13.5
Masterful
Exceptionally well-organized with flawless grammar and spelling. Perfectly formatted as per guidelines.
|
13.5 >12.75
Skilled
Well-organized with minimal grammatical or spelling mistakes. Mostly adheres to formatting guidelines.
|
12.75 >12.0
Proficient
Organized with some grammatical or spelling mistakes that don’t hinder understanding. Some minor formatting issues.
|
12 >11.25
Developing
Some organizational issues and noticeable grammatical or spelling mistakes. Formatting may not fully adhere to guidelines.
|
11.25 >10.5
Emerging
Lacks clear organization and has numerous grammatical or spelling mistakes. Significant formatting issues.
|
10.5 >0
Insufficient
Poorly organized with pervasive grammatical or spelling mistakes. Largely ignores formatting guidelines.
|
|
15 point
|
|
Readings and Concepts
|
| 25 >24.0
Masterful
Expertly engages with and cites course readings and concepts. Demonstrates deep understanding of the rational choice framework.
|
24 >21.25
Skilled
Engages effectively with course readings and concepts. Shows good understanding of the rational choice framework.
|
21.25 >20.0
Proficient
Engages with course readings and concepts adequately. Understands the rational choice framework.
|
20 >18.75
Developing
Engages minimally with course readings and concepts. Some understanding of the rational choice framework.
|
18.75 >17.5
Emerging
Minimal engagement with course readings and concepts. Limited understanding of the rational choice framework.
|
17.5 >0
Insufficient
Does not engage with course readings or concepts. No understanding of the rational choice framework.
|
|
25 point
|
|
Evidence
|
| 25 >22.5
Masterful
Offers insightful critique and robust evidence to support the presented argument, considering viewpoints from lectures or materials, including the professor’s perspective.
|
22.5 >21.25
Skilled
Offers solid critique and substantial evidence to support the argument, considering viewpoints from lectures or materials.
|
21.25 >20.0
Proficient
Offers basic critique and some evidence to substantiate the argument, considering viewpoints from lectures or materials.
|
20 >18.75
Developing
Attempts to critique viewpoints and provide evidence for the argument from lectures or materials, but may be superficial.
|
18.75 >17.5
Emerging
Minimal critique of viewpoints and scant evidence for the argument, with potential misunderstandings.
|
17.5 >0
Insufficient
Does not offer valid critique or provide sufficient evidence to support the argument, and misunderstands viewpoints.
|
|
25 point
|
|
Originality of Thoughts
|
| 15 >13.5
Masterful
Demonstrates significant originality, presenting innovative ideas or perspectives.
|
13.5 >12.75
Skilled
Shows some originality in ideas or perspectives.
|
12.75 >12.0
Proficient
Demonstrates basic originality, with some reliance on existing ideas.
|
12 >10.5
Emerging
Limited originality, with significant reliance on existing ideas.
|
10.5 >0
Insufficient
No evidence of originality or independent thought.
|
|
15 point
|
|
Total Score：100
|
Explanation & Answer
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
