Description
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS697 Signature Acute Care Case Study (cholecystitis) completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Management of the critically ill patient requires multiple considerations. The AGACNP must be prepared to consider appropriate diagnostic tests, treatment, consultations with managing the critically ill patient. For this assignment, you will explore the management strategies of one acute illness in the critical care setting.
- Pick one critical illness that you will likely see in the acute care setting.
- Provide a brief overview of the pathophysiology of this condition.
- Discuss common signs and symptoms and consider unique presentation of this condition.
- Discuss how this condition is ultimately diagnosed.
- Discuss how the patient will be managed in the emergency department (Consider initial lab tests, medications, imaging, etc).
- Discuss criteria for considering admission to the intensive care unit.
- Discuss management strategies for intensive monitoring of this condition.
- Discuss discharge planning for this scenario and consider when the patient is stable enough to step down from the critical care unit and then discharged home, to a skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation or other outpatient center.
- Your Paper should include a minimum of three peer-reviewed references from scholarly articles no more than 5 years old. This does not include your textbook or websites.
- Your paper should also include one national guideline.
- Please refer to the rubric for additional guidance.
Rubric
NURS_697_DE – Week 7 Signature Assignment
NURS_697_DE – Week 7 Signature Assignment
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverview and pathophysiology of the medical illness
|
| 25 to >18.75 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Explains clearly and thoroughly the medical condition and how the patient may present to the acute care facility.
|
18.75 to >12.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Provides partial overview of the medical condition and how the patient may present to the acute care facility
|
12.5 to >6.25 pts
Below Expectations
Provides brief and incomplete understanding of the medical condition or does not choose a critical illness to discuss.
|
6.25 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not provide brief/incomplete understanding of the medical condition.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation and management in the emergency department
|
| 25 to >18.75 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of the management of the acutely ill patient in the emergency department. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic.
|
18.75 to >12.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of the management of the acutely ill patient in the emergency department. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic.
|
12.5 to >6.25 pts
Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of the management of the acutely ill patient in the emergency department. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Or does not choose a critical illness to discuss
|
6.25 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManagement in the intensive care unit
|
| 25 to >18.75 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of the management of the acutely ill patient in the intensive care. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic
|
18.75 to >12.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of the management of the acutely ill patient in the intensive care unit. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic
|
12.5 to >6.25 pts
Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of the management of the acutely ill patient in the intensive care unit. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic.
|
6.25 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDischarge Criteria
|
| 25 to >18.75 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of the discharge criteria. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic
|
18.75 to >12.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis the discharge criteria. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic
|
12.5 to >6.25 pts
Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of the discharge criteria. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic.
|
6.25 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
| 25 to >18.75 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Makes insightful, clear, and accurate connections relating to proper documentation and the appropriate use of clinical notes. Offers detailed and specific examples regarding effect on current clinical practice settings.
|
18.75 to >12.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Makes mostly accurate connections relating to proper documentation and the appropriate use of clinical notes, but may lack an important detail. Response indicates a general understanding regarding effect on current clinical practice settings.
|
12.5 to >6.25 pts
Below Expectations
Provides several insufficient or inaccurate connections relating to proper documentation and the appropriate use of clinical notes. Response indicates an introductory understanding regarding effect on current clinical practice settings.
|
6.25 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of current trend/issue and importance to lobby for any support funding.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication
|
| 15 to >11.25 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Provides fully applications from clinical/personal to practice
|
11.25 to >7.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Provides partially applications from clinical/personal to practice
|
7.5 to >3.75 pts
Below Expectations
Provides brief or incomplete applications from clinical/personal to practice
|
3.75 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Provides no brief, no applications from clinical/personal to practice
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences, APA Style, grammar, spelling, and punctuation
|
| 10 to >8.5 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Complete list of references/citations with no APA errors Include peer research-based articles. Speaker notes were included for each slide.
|
8.5 to >7.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Mostly complete list of references or citations with 1-3 APA errors Include mostly peer research based articles. Speaker notes were included for most of the slides.
|
7 to >5.0 pts
Below Expectations
Partial list of references or citations with 3-5 APA errors Include few peer research based articles. Speaker notes were included for less than most slides
|
5 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
No references listed or cited with multiple errors Include no peer research based articles. No speaker notes were included
|
|
10 pts
|
|
Total Points: 150
|
Explanation & Answer
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
