NR506NP-61159Discussions Week 1: Barriers to Practice

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR506NP-61159Discussions Week 1: Barriers to Practice  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do my paper

Preparing the Discussion

Using the readings from this week as well as reliable outside resources to:

1. Identify and describe practice barriers for all four APNs’ roles in your state and discuss these barriers on a state and national level. The four roles include the nurse midwife, nurse anesthetist, nurse practitioner, and clinical nurse specialist.
2. Identify forms of competition on the state and national level that interfere with APNs’ ability to practice independently.
3. Identify the specific lawmakers by name at the state level (i.e., key members of the state’s legislative branch and executive branch of government)
4. Discuss interest groups that exist at the state and national levels that influence APN policy.
5. Discuss methods used to influence change in policy in forms of competition, state legislative and executive branches of government, and interest groups.
6. A scholarly resource must be used for EACH discussion question each
7. RUBRIC:NR506NP Wk 1 Barriers to Practice

8. NR506NP Wk 1 Barriers to Practice

   Criteria	Ratings	Pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Barriers	15 ptsExcellentProvides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence describes APN barriers to practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 14 ptsV. GoodProvides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence describes APN barriers to practice. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 12 ptsSatisfactoryDiscussions uses sparse scholarly inquiry to discuss barriers to practice but does not state how scholarly Information is taken from sources. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic. 8 ptsNeeds ImprovementDiscussions does not use scholarly inquiry to describe barriers to practice. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly. 0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDiscussion did not include criteria.	15 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompetition	15 ptsExcellentProvides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating the forms of competition to APN practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 14 ptsV. GoodProvides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry stating the forms of competition to APN practice but does not clearly state how the evidence supports the stated forms of competition. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 12 ptsSatisfactoryDiscussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state the forms of competition to APN practice. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic. 8 ptsNeeds ImprovementDiscussions does not use scholarly inquiry and does not state how scholarly inquiry describes the forms of competition to practice. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly. 0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDiscussion did not include criteria.	15 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Law Makers	15 ptsExcellentProvides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry in identifying law makers at the state level. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 14 ptsV. GoodProvides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry in identifying law makers at the state level. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 12 ptsSatisfactoryDiscussions use sparse scholarly inquiry in identifying law makers at the state level. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic. 8 ptsNeeds ImprovementDiscussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry in identifying law makers at the state level. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly. 0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDiscussion did not include criteria.	15 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterest Groups	15 ptsExcellentProvides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry at identifying interest groups at the state and national level. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 14 ptsV. GoodProvides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry at identifying interest groups at the state and national level. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 12 ptsSatisfactoryDiscussions uses sparse scholarly inquiry at identifying interest groups at the state and national level. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic. 8 ptsNeeds ImprovementDiscussions does not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry at identifying interest groups at the state and national level. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly. 0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDiscussion did not include criteria.	15 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethods to Influence Change	15 ptsExcellentProvides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of methods used to influence a change to eliminate barriers. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 14 ptsV. GoodProvides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of methods used to influence a change to eliminate barriers. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable scholarly outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 12 ptsSatisfactoryDiscussions uses sparse scholarly inquiry of methods used to influence a change to eliminate barriers. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic. 8 ptsNeeds ImprovementDiscussions do not use scholarly inquiry and do not state scholarly inquiry of methods used to influence a change to eliminate barriers. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly. 0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDiscussion did not include criteria.	15 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteractive Dialogue• Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion; • Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion) • Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class) • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.	20 ptsExcellentDemonstrated all elements for the Criterion 18 ptsV. GoodMissing 1 element for the Criterion 17 ptsSatisfactoryMissing 2 elements for the Criterion 10 ptsNeeds ImprovementMissing 3 elements for the Criterion 0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing 4 elements for the Criterion	20 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation	5 ptsExcellentGrammar, spelling, punctuation, and APA are accurate, or with zero to one error. 4 ptsV. Good2-4 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted. 3 ptsSatisfactory5-7 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted. 2 ptsNeeds Improvement8-9 errors grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. 0 ptsUnsatisfactoryPost contains 10 or greater errors grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.	5 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation	0 ptsDiscussion late penalty deductionsA 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday by 11:59PM MST, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0) 0 ptsTotal Participation ResponsesA 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days and/or faculty posts. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)	0 pts
   Total Points: 100