Cyber Security Question

Critically review TWO articles related to an issue in security administration. Submit 2 files.

Each article will be from a different security publication from the list below:

• Homeland Defense Journal
• Information Security
• Information Systems Security
• Intelligence and National Security
• International Journal of Conflict Management
• International Journal of Information Security
• International Journal of Police Science and Management
• International Security
• Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
• Journal of Information Privacy and Security
• Journal of Security Education
• Safety Director’s Report
• Security and Terrorism Bulletin
• Security Director’s Report
• Security Studies

The articles can be research-based or expository, as long as they are current (published within
the last 4 years) and relate to a security administration issue or problem.

Each review is expected to be between 1,000 and 1,250 words typed. As a rule of thumb, the first
half of the review should be a summary of the information contained in the article, and the second
half should contain your critical analysis and review of the article. Your submission should cover
the major theory or thesis, research methodology and population studied (if any), major
arguments or points of view, findings or conclusions, and major issues. It should also include a
critique of the author’s work and its implications and usefulness for security managers and
administrators. APA Style guidelines will be adhered to in all respects.

Journal Article Critical Review Grading Rubric

Your reviews will be assessed on each of the following ten (10) elements, but your review should
be a consolidated and integrated product.

Element Points Possible

• Article is from an approved publication 10
• Relates to security administration issue/problem 10
• Length (1,000 – 1,250 words typed) 10
• One half summary/one half analysis/critique 10
• Major theory, thesis, research methodology discussed 10
• Major arguments/points of view discussed 10
• Findings/conclusions/major issues discussed 10
• Implications for security administration discussed 10
• Structure/grammar/punctuation/APA Style 10

TOTAL POINTS 90

In general, each of the above elements will be assessed as: Exceeds Expectations (90 – 100 %),
Meets Expectations (75 – 89%), Does Not Meet Expectations (60 -74%), or No Evidence (Below
60%) using the following criteria: Element is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; Major
points are stated clearly and well-supported; Structural elements are integrated; Writing is clear
and easy to follow; Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage and punctuation are followed; APA

View Rubric

CJ333 Journal Review Rubric (F2, 2022)

CJ333 Journal Review Rubric (F2, 2022)
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Approved Publication view longer description	10 pts Full Marks Article is from an approved publication 0 pts No Marks Article is not from an approved publication	/ 10 pts
Security Relation view longer description	10 pts Full Marks Article relates to security administration issue/problem? 0 pts No Marks Article does not relate to security administration issue/problem?	/ 10 pts
Journal Review Length view longer description	10 pts Achieves required length. Achieves full required length of 1,000 words 10 to >0 pts Less than required length Fails to achieve required length of 1,000 words.	/ 10 pts
Segmentation view longer description	10 pts Full Marks Journal review is equally divided with half focused on the summary and the other half analysis / critique. 10 to >0 pts No Marks Journal review is not equally divided with half focused on the summary and the other half analysis / critique.	/ 10 pts
Method view longer description	10 pts Full Marks Major theory, thesis, research methodology fully discussed. 10 to >0 pts No Marks Major theory, thesis, research methodology partially or not discussed.	/ 10 pts
Major Arguments / Points of View view longer description	10 pts Full Marks Major arguments/points of view fully discussed. 10 to >0 pts No Marks Major arguments/points of view partially or not discussed	/ 10 pts
Findings / Conclusion view longer description	10 to >9 pts Full Marks Findings/conclusions/major issues fully discussed. 9 to >0 pts No Marks Findings/conclusions/major issues partially or not discussed.	/ 10 pts
Security Implications view longer description	10 to >9 pts Full Marks Implications for security administration fully discussed. 9 to >0 pts No Marks Implications for security administration partially or not discussed	/ 10 pts
Syntax view longer description	10 to >9 pts Full Marks Structure/grammar/punctuation/APA Style correct with no errors 9 to >0 pts No Marks Structure/grammar/punctuation/APA Style partially or not correct with errors.	/ 10 pts